|
| Controversy surrounds Collier commissioner race |
Kara Kenney
Last updated on:
8/23/2006 6:17:17 PM |
|
COLLIER
COUNTY:
Accusations are flying in the race for Collier County
Commissioner. The Naples Daily News is now caught up in the
controversy after they endorsed a candidate that may be able to swing
an upcoming vote in their favor. Some people say it is a blatant
conflict of interest and the issue has the whole community buzzing.
The controversy
began when
the paper ran an article endorsing incumbent Frank Halas as their pick
for commissioner. On September 12, just seven days after the
primary, Halas will vote on a zoning request for the Naples Daily News
building.
"Bribery, illegal,
corrupt,"
said independent candidate Michael Lissak about the Naples Daily News'
endorsement of Commissioner Halas. "They have abused their
position by attempting to bribe a county commissioner."
The issue centers
on a piece
of land off of Immokalee Road where the Naples Daily News wants to put
its new headquarters.
"The Naples Daily
News is a
company and they have a multi-million dollar interest right behind me,"
said Lissack while standing on the land in question.
Lissack recently
filed a
criminal complaint with the Collier County Sheriff's Office. It's a
move that has many people talking.
"I think they
should stay
neutral on everyone. If anyone should, the paper should," said Collier
resident Dan Whewell.
Halas is set to
face Joe
Foster in the primary.
"I'm not sure it
rises to
criminal activity. I think there is a perceived conflict of interest
given they're going before the county commissioners a week after the
election," said Foster.
Phil Lewis, the
editor of
the Naples Daily News says, "All five commissioners will base their
decision on the law and what they feel is best for the citizens of
Collier County, not whether they like us or not."
Lewis then
went on to
say that the editorial board who endorsed Halas has nothing to do with
the new building. He said that while Halas was interviewed by an
employee of the newspaper - the relocation was not even discussed.
Halas was out of
town on
Wednesday, but was quoted as saying, "Voters in Collier County realize
what's going on and they have a better understanding of what the real
issues are."
Lissack says the
only
solution is for Halas to remove himself from the upcoming re-zone vote.
"If he votes, he's
been
bought and paid for," said Lissack.
Officials from the
Naples
Daily News say they endorsed Halas because of his stance on big-picture
issues such as taxes, affordable housing, and impact fees.
© Copyright 1996 - 2006
Waterman
Broadcasting Corporation. All
rights reserved.
|
Michael
Lissack's Public
Statement
The hubris of the Naples Daily News in ignoring the effect of its
endorsement of Frank Halas re the potential perception of his vote
being "purchased" reveals a simple truth -- the NDN lives in its own
world out of touch with reality. In the real world dangling something
of value in front of an elected official just before he is to decide
something vital to your commercial interests is known as a bribe.
Bribes are illegal. The NDN acts as a self appointed ethics police for
others but only hubris exempts self. If Frank Halas were to vote on the
NDN rezoning how will anyone know he wasn't bought and paid for with
the NDN endorsement? The NDN editorial staff has played kingmaker long
enough and this time it has grossly abused its community role.
EW Scripps owes an apology to the citizens of Collier County and owes
us new leadership at the NDN. It is time to put irresponsible and
arrogant journalism behind us.
Why
do the NDN’s actions constitute a
bribe?
The
Naples Daily News gave Frank Halas an endorsement (which he regarded as
a gain or advantage) and which the NDN knew was an act beneficial to
Halas in whose own welfare he is interested, The NDN desires
Halas to vote yes on its rezoning which vote is an act within Halas’s
official discretion in performance of his public duty. The NDN
thereby sought to influence Halas’s action. Further, the NDN had
been advised in writing of the conflict of interest and chose to ignore
it. NDN's action were therefore knowing and willful.
Florida
Statutes
838.015 Bribery.--
(1) "Bribery"
means
corruptly to
give,
offer,
or promise
to any
public servant,
or, if a public servant, corruptly to request, solicit, accept, or
agree to
accept for himself or herself or another, any
pecuniary
or other benefit not
authorized by
law with
an intent or purpose to influence the performance of any act or
omission which the
person believes to be, or the public servant represents as being,
within the
official discretion of a public servant, in violation of a public duty,
or in
performance of a public duty.
838.016 Unlawful compensation or reward for official
behavior.--
(1) It
is unlawful for any person corruptly to give,
offer,
or promise to any
public
servant,
or, if a
public
servant, corruptly to request, solicit, accept, or agree to accept, any
pecuniary
or other benefit not
authorized by
law, for
the past, present, or future performance,
nonperformance, or violation of any
act or
omission
which the person believes to have been, or the public servant
represents as
having been, either
within the official discretion of the public servant, in violation of a
public
duty, or in
performance of a public duty.
Nothing
herein shall be construed to preclude a public
servant from accepting rewards for services performed in apprehending
any
criminal.
(2) It
is unlawful for any person corruptly to give,
offer,
or promise to any
public
servant,
or, if a
public
servant, corruptly to request, solicit, accept, or agree to accept, any pecuniary
or other benefit not
authorized by
law for
the past, present, or future exertion of any influence upon or with any
other
public
servant
regarding any act or omission which the person believes to have been,
or which
is represented to him or her as having been, either within the official
discretion
of the
other public
servant,
in violation of a public duty, or in
performance of a public duty.
838.014 Definitions.--As
used in this chapter, the
term:
"Benefit"
means
gain or advantage, or anything
regarded by the person to be benefited
as a gain or advantage,
including
the doing of an
act beneficial to any person in whose welfare he or she is interested,
including any commission, gift, gratuity, property, commercial
interest, or any
other thing of economic value not authorized by law.
"Corruptly"
or "with corrupt intent" means acting knowingly and dishonestly
for a wrongful purpose.
|